Comments on: Diamonds Are No Longer The Hardest Natural Substance On Earth!

By: Steph

Steph — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:25:50 +0000

Kelly, I think the article is about diamond. Whether the diamonds are no longer the hardest natural substance on earth, i still think that it’s the best gem. Would you agree?

By: Claudine

Claudine — Tue, 04 May 2010 08:32:46 +0000

I also learned that meteorite is harder than diamond. But the only difference is the availability. Meteorite is from space and diamond is available on earth. Am I right? If this statement is a mistake, forgive me.

By: Thesa

Thesa — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:04:24 +0000

Out of curiosity I clicked on link AND I CAN’T BELIEVE IT!!! It’s true, there is a stone (with a hardness of 5-6, about right) harder than diamond. I have got to find out the etymology.

By: Francis

Francis — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:59:44 +0000

Now do I have to buy my girlfriend a lonsdalite ring that costs a little more than 3 months salary now?

By: Jessy

Jessy — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:51:26 +0000

I heard about it and it is kind of cool. But it needs a prettier name though. Nothing can beat diamonds for we ladies.

By: Martina

Martina — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:38:47 +0000

Do these two substances look good on a gold or a silver ring? I don’t think so. I’m sticking to diamonds. A jewelry like a Jamesallen diamond ring brings out the beauty of a woman from the time of Cleopatra up until now.

By: Cody

Cody — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:36:09 +0000

Wow, cool. Finally something harder than ‘the hardest substance in the world’.

By: Ecil

Ecil — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:38:31 +0000

Interesting!! Harder than diamond? I wonder how hard that would be. This is a new experiments for the scientists.But really nothing can devalue diamonds to me.It is just too beautiful on its own.